Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured, concise skill that clearly defines grounding rules and workflows for answering questions about a specific talk. Its main weakness is the lack of concrete examples showing expected output format (e.g., a sample Q&A with timestamp citation, a sample summary structure). The referenced supporting files (outline.md, transcript.md, quotes.md) are not available for verification but are logically organized.
Suggestions
Add one concrete example showing a sample question and expected answer format with timestamp citation, e.g., 'Q: What does Dave say about regulators? A: At [12:34], Dave describes regulators as...'
Include a brief example of how to flag speech-to-text uncertainty, e.g., 'The transcript reads "[garbled] regulation" — the exact word is unclear from the transcription.'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient. Every section serves a clear purpose—grounding rules, Q&A guidance, summary guidance, application guidance. No unnecessary explanations of what bipolar disorder is, what transcripts are, or how speech-to-text works. Assumes Claude's competence throughout. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The guidance is specific and structured (e.g., 'Read outline.md first', 'Cite timestamps', 'Start with the thesis') but lacks concrete examples of expected output format, sample Q&A pairs, or demonstration of how to cite timestamps or flag garbled text. The instructions describe what to do but don't show it being done. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | For this type of skill (reference Q&A from a transcript), the workflow is clear and well-sequenced: read outline first → locate relevant section → read transcript → answer with citations. Grounding rules provide explicit validation checkpoints (flag uncertainty, don't silently correct, say so if not addressed). The three task types (factual Q&A, summaries, applying the talk) each have clear step sequences. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references outline.md, transcript.md, and quotes.md with clear purposes for each, which is good progressive disclosure design. However, no bundle files were provided, so we cannot verify these references exist or are well-structured. The SKILL.md itself is appropriately concise as an overview, but the absence of the referenced files limits the score. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |