CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

jbaruch/speaker-toolkit

Two-skill presentation system: analyze your speaking style into a rhetoric knowledge vault, then create new presentations that match your documented patterns. Includes an 88-entry Presentation Patterns taxonomy for scoring, brainstorming, and go-live preparation.

Overall
score

95%

Does it follow best practices?

Validation for skill structure

Overview
Skills
Evals
Files

_anti_hiccup-words.mdskills/presentation-creator/references/patterns/deliver/

id:
hiccup-words
name:
Hiccup Words
type:
antipattern
part:
deliver
phase_relevance:
guardrails
vault_dimensions:
7, 14
detection_signals:
frequent filler words, um/ah patterns, stammering under pressure
related_patterns:
breathing-room, carnegie-hall
inverse_of:
breathing-room
difficulty:
foundational

Hiccup Words

Summary

Involuntary filler words — "um," "ah," "actually," "frankly," "basically," "like," "you know" — that distract the audience and undermine speaker credibility. They are a natural stress response that can be reduced through awareness and practice.

The Pattern in Detail

Every speaker has them. "Um" and "ah" are the most universal, but the specific filler words vary by individual and culture. Some speakers pepper their delivery with "actually" or "basically" or "so" or "right?" or "you know." These verbal tics are a natural neurological response to the gap between thinking speed and speaking speed — when your brain needs a moment to formulate the next phrase, it fills the silence with a placeholder sound rather than allowing a pause. Under the stress of live presentation, the frequency of these fillers increases dramatically.

The insidious quality of hiccup words is the asymmetry of awareness. The speaker rarely notices their own fillers — the words are produced unconsciously and filter out of self-awareness. But the audience notices. In fact, once an audience member starts tracking your "ums," they often cannot stop. The filler words become the foreground, and your actual content becomes background noise. One study found that speakers who used more than five filler words per minute were rated significantly less credible and less knowledgeable than those who used fewer, regardless of the actual content quality.

The most effective remedy is recording yourself. Video or audio recording of a rehearsal (Carnegie Hall pattern) reveals the true extent of your filler word habit, which is almost always worse than you think. The shock of hearing yourself say "um" forty times in a five-minute segment is a powerful motivator for change. Some speakers use apps that count filler words in real time, providing immediate feedback during practice sessions.

The root cause is fear of silence. Speakers unconsciously believe that any gap in speech signals incompetence or lost train of thought. The Breathing Room pattern directly addresses this by reframing silence as a tool rather than a failure. When you embrace the pause, the pressure to fill every moment with sound — even meaningless sound — dissipates. Practice replacing filler words with silence: when you feel an "um" forming, simply close your mouth and pause. The audience perceives this as confident deliberation, not confusion.

When caught off guard by a question you cannot answer, resist the temptation to stammer through a response. "I don't know" delivered clearly and confidently is infinitely better than "Well, um, actually, I think, you know, basically..." The honest admission projects more credibility than the filler-laden attempt at an answer.

When to Use / When to Avoid

This is an antipattern to recognize and mitigate, not a pattern to apply. Every speaker should monitor their filler word frequency and actively work to reduce it. The mitigation is ongoing — filler words are deeply habitual and resurface under stress even after significant improvement. Complete elimination is neither realistic nor necessary; the goal is reduction to the point where fillers do not distract from content.

Detection Heuristics

  • Count of filler words per minute exceeds a noticeable threshold
  • Audience members visibly distracted or counting fillers
  • Filler frequency increases during complex explanations or Q&A
  • Speaker seems unaware of their verbal tics

Scoring Criteria

  • Strong signal (2 pts): Minimal filler words throughout — speaker pauses confidently instead of filling gaps, delivery is clean and professional
  • Moderate signal (1 pt): Occasional filler words present but not distractingly frequent — speaker shows awareness and sometimes self-corrects
  • Absent (0 pts): Frequent filler words throughout delivery, noticeably undermining credibility and distracting from content

Relationship to Vault Dimensions

This antipattern maps to Vault Dimension 7 (Clarity / Communication) because filler words literally obscure the message, and to Vault Dimension 14 (Speaker Craft / Professionalism) because filler word management is a fundamental professional speaking skill.

Combinatorics

Hiccup Words is the direct inverse of the Breathing Room pattern — strategic silence replaces nervous filler. Carnegie Hall rehearsal with recording is the primary mitigation tool. The Display of High Value pattern is undermined by excessive fillers — a speaker who says "um" constantly cannot project confident authority. The Shoeless pattern may indirectly help by reducing overall anxiety, which reduces filler frequency.

Install with Tessl CLI

npx tessl i jbaruch/speaker-toolkit

skills

presentation-creator

references

patterns

_index.md

guardrails.md

process.md

slide-generation.md

SKILL.md

CHANGELOG.md

README.md

tile.json