benevolent-governance-demonstration

Use when building popular support through benevolent governance or demonstrating virtue as a ruler. Applies Tang's three-sided net principle, self-reflection via public welfare, minister appointment, and post-war benevolence practices.

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_017/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, concise instruction-only skill that grounds each method in primary-source quotes and closes with a validation section. Its main weakness is actionability: several directives remain abstract rather than giving concrete, executable guidance.

Suggestions

Convert abstract directives (e.g. "Show restraint", "Let actions speak louder than words") into concrete, checkable actions or worked examples.

Tighten the "Story" prose into a one-line framing so the three-sided net principle leads with its application rather than narrative.

Make the Validation checks concrete pass/fail criteria (e.g. specify which welfare indicators to confirm and what "improvement" looks like).

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Mostly lean bullets and short directives with minimal padding; the narrative retelling of Tang's net story is the main trimmable prose, keeping it just below a 5.	4 / 5
Actionability	Methods are named and illustrated with primary-source quotes, but several directives stay abstract ("Let actions speak louder than words", "Show restraint even when you have power") without concrete, executable steps; not a 4 because key specifics are missing.	3 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear structure flows from methods to expected outcomes, decision points, and an explicit Validation section with checkpoints; not a 5 because the validation checks are stated as principles rather than concrete pass/fail criteria.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Well-organized into clearly headed sections with no nested or buried references and no bundle files to mismanage; not a 5 only because the body slightly exceeds the ~50-line threshold where sectioning alone earns top marks.	4 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A solid, third-person description that pairs an explicit "Use when" trigger with a concrete list of the practices it applies. It is distinctive and largely free of fluff, though the trigger phrasing and action list could be slightly more explicit and varied.

Suggestions

Add a couple of natural synonyms or alternate phrasings (e.g. "winning popular support", "ruling by virtue") to broaden trigger matching.

Sharpen the "when" clause with a concrete situational trigger (e.g. "Use when a ruler needs to legitimize rule or rally allies through demonstrable mercy").

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists several concrete practices ("three-sided net principle, self-reflection via public welfare, minister appointment, and post-war benevolence practices") rather than vague language, with only minor coverage gaps; not a 5 because the actions are named at a high level without fuller enumeration.	4 / 5
Completeness	Both "what" ("Applies Tang's three-sided net principle...") and "when" ("Use when building popular support...") are present; not a 5 because the "when" clause could be more explicit with concrete trigger contexts.	4 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Natural phrases a user might say ("building popular support", "benevolent governance", "demonstrating virtue as a ruler") are present; not a 5 because synonyms and variant phrasings are missing for this niche domain.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The Tang / benevolent-governance framing is a clear, narrow niche with distinctive triggers unlikely to collide with other skills.	5 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: baojie/shiji-kb
Path: kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_017/SKILL.md
Commit: 6b836e3

Reviewed: 13 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.