defensive-camp-circle-formation

Use when defending against cavalry in open terrain with no natural cover. Deploys armored wagons (武刚车) in a circular formation to create a mobile fortification, enabling cavalry sorties and counterattack when conditions shift.

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a concise, well-sequenced tactical procedure with an explicit verification section and good organization for a short skill. It is held below top marks by minor redundancy, a couple of vague directives, and the absence of an explicit error-recovery feedback loop.

Suggestions

Remove redundant sub-bullets (e.g., 'Create a mobile fortification' and 'Wagons form the perimeter' repeat 'circular formation') to tighten conciseness.

Add specifics to the vague steps — quantify or constrain 'Use weather to advantage' and 'Extend wings to envelop enemy' as concretely as the 5,000-rider example.

Add a brief validate-then-fix feedback loop in the Verification section (e.g., 'If a perimeter gap is found, reposition wagons and re-verify') to reach full workflow clarity.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and bullet-driven, but a few sub-bullets ('Create a mobile fortification', 'Wagons form the perimeter') partially restate the prior point, fitting 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed'.	4 / 5
Actionability	Concrete actionable steps with a specific example ('Send out cavalry probes (e.g., 5,000 riders)') cover most cases, but steps like 'Use weather to advantage' and 'Extend wings to envelop enemy' lack specifics, leaving minor gaps below the fully-executable 5.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear 6-step numbered sequence is followed by a Verification section with explicit checkpoints (perimeter completeness, force positioning, weather exploitation), but there is no validate-then-fix feedback loop, which the 5 anchor requires.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Under 50 lines with no external references needed, organized into clear sections (Overview, Steps, Expected Outcome, Verification), matching the simple-skill exception that allows a 5 for well-organized short skills.	5 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it explicitly covers both what the skill does and when to use it with concrete, domain-natural trigger phrases, and occupies a distinctive niche. Minor weakness is limited synonym coverage in the trigger terms.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists several concrete actions ('Deploys armored wagons (武刚车) in a circular formation', 'create a mobile fortification', 'enabling cavalry sorties and counterattack'), matching the 'several specific actions; minor gaps' anchor rather than the fully comprehensive 5.	4 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what ('Deploys armored wagons... enabling cavalry sorties and counterattack') and when ('Use when defending against cavalry in open terrain with no natural cover') with concrete triggers, matching the 5 anchor.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Natural trigger phrases ('defending against cavalry in open terrain with no natural cover') give good keyword coverage for the niche, but synonym breadth is limited so it falls short of the comprehensive 5.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	A highly specific niche (armored-wagon circle formation vs cavalry) with distinct triggers means minimal overlap with other skills, matching the 5 anchor.	5 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: baojie/shiji-kb
Path: kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_225/SKILL.md
Commit: 6b836e3

Reviewed: 7 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.