Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable instruction-only skill with a clear workflow and terminal verification checklist. It is held back only by minor explanatory padding and the absence of an explicit feedback/retry loop.
Suggestions
Trim explanatory justifications (e.g., "This demonstrates respect for hierarchy and avoids overstepping authority") to lift conciseness toward a 5.
Add an explicit feedback loop in Verification (e.g., if circumstances were not thoroughly investigated, reconvene the council before escalating) to push workflow_clarity to 5.
Specify what the field commander should formally report to the sovereign when escorting the accused, to close the minor actionability gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and well-sectioned, but includes minor explanatory padding such as "This demonstrates respect for hierarchy and avoids overstepping authority" that could be trimmed; not lean enough for a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance — named officer roles (正, 长史, 议郎), explicit strict/lenient arguments, and a clear defer-to-sovereign action — with only minor gaps (e.g., what to formally report to the sovereign). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered 5-step sequence is paired with an explicit Verification checklist; held below 5 because there is no retry/feedback loop, only terminal validation checks. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with well-organized sections and no need for external references, matching the simple-skills exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |