CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

military-justice-deliberation-process

Use when deciding the fate of a defeated general who returns after losing their forces. Convenes advisors, weighs strict versus lenient views, and defers to higher authority rather than unilateral execution.

75

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a tight, well-structured instruction-only skill: a clear sequenced workflow with named roles and concrete actions, a decision principle, and an explicit verification checklist. It assumes Claude's competence and stays within token budget with no padding.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes competence — it never explains what a general or military justice is, and every section (Overview, Steps, Decision Principle, Expected Outcome, Verification) earns its place; not level 2 because there is no padded or unnecessary explanation.

3 / 3

Actionability

Steps give concrete, specific guidance for an instruction-only skill — named roles ("legal officers (正), secretaries (长史), and advisors (议郎)") and concrete actions ("Escort the accused to the sovereign for final judgment"); not level 2 because key details are present rather than pseudocode-like or missing.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clear five-step sequence is followed by an explicit Verification section functioning as a checklist (confirm arguments heard, validate circumstances investigated, check escalation to higher authority), matching the level-3 anchor with explicit validation steps.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, and needs no external references; it is organized into well-labeled sections, which per the simple-skills scoring note earns a 3 without bundle files.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

85%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise, uses correct third-person voice, and clearly states both the trigger condition and the concrete actions the skill performs. Its only weakness is a single trigger phrase with no synonymous variations, which leaves trigger-term coverage at level 2.

Suggestions

Add one or two natural trigger variations (e.g., "what to do with a general who lost his army" or "whether to execute a defeated commander") so the trigger matches more phrasings a user might actually say.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — "Convenes advisors, weighs strict versus lenient views, and defers to higher authority rather than unilateral execution" — rather than vague language; not the level-2 single-domain anchor because it enumerates several specific procedural actions.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both "when" ("Use when deciding the fate of a defeated general...") and "what" (convenes advisors, weighs views, defers to higher authority) with an explicit Use-when trigger, matching the level-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

The trigger "Use when deciding the fate of a defeated general who returns after losing their forces" has relevant natural keywords but only a single trigger path with no common variations or synonyms, matching the level-2 anchor rather than the broad coverage of level 3.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is highly specific (military justice for a defeated returning general) with distinct triggers unlikely to overlap with other skills, matching the level-3 clear-niche anchor.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
baojie/shiji-kb
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.