strategic-assassination-planning

Use when analyzing historical power transitions through targeted action, such as Prince Guang's (King Helu) removal of King Liao. Covers legitimacy claims, agent recruitment, timing, operational security, and consolidation.

Quality

69%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Critical

Do not install without reviewing

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_066/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is lean and well-structured with a clear sequenced workflow and explicit validation checkpoints. Its chief weakness is actionability: most step guidance is high-level and abstract rather than concrete and specific.

Suggestions

Add concrete, specific detail to each step (e.g., named criteria for 'optimal timing', concrete cover-story examples) rather than abstract directives like 'Document your rightful position'.

Interleave the validation checkpoints into the workflow steps as inline feedback loops rather than isolating them in a trailing section.

Provide a brief worked example (beyond the opening Overview reference) that demonstrates the framework end-to-end so the guidance is executable rather than descriptive.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is organized into tight bullet lists with minimal padding and no re-explanation of concepts Claude already knows, with only minor phrasing that could be trimmed, fitting the 4-anchor.	4 / 5
Actionability	The six steps give a recognizable sequence with some concrete sub-bullets ('Conceal weapons in everyday items', 'Station forces in concealed locations'), but most guidance stays abstract ('Document your rightful position', 'Identify talented individuals') without specific, actionable detail, matching the 3-anchor.	3 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clearly numbered six-step sequence is paired with a dedicated Validation section containing explicit checkpoints, satisfying the destructive-operation validation requirement; validation is a trailing section rather than inline feedback loops, keeping it just below the 5-anchor.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	With no bundle files and a body under 50 lines, the well-organized sections (Overview, Steps, Key Conditions, Expected Outcomes, Validation) meet the simple-skill exception that allows a 5 on structure alone.	5 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Description

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description cleanly states both what it covers and when to use it, with a clear niche and several concrete coverage areas. Its main weakness is trigger-term breadth: the keywords are niche and lack natural synonyms a user would commonly say.

Suggestions

Add natural trigger phrases and synonyms a user might actually say (e.g., 'succession crises', 'coups', 'regime change', 'palace intrigue') alongside the historical example.

Broaden the example beyond a single case (King Liao) to a small set of recognizable trigger scenarios so the 'when' clause fires more reliably.

Tighten the 'Covers ...' list into verbs (e.g., 'Analyzes legitimacy claims, recruits agents, times action...') to sharpen the capability framing.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description names the domain and enumerates several concrete coverage areas — 'legitimacy claims, agent recruitment, timing, operational security, and consolidation' — giving broad but not fully comprehensive action coverage, fitting just above the 3-anchor.	4 / 5
Completeness	An explicit 'Use when...' clause supplies the trigger and the 'Covers ...' clause supplies the what; both are present but the 'when' leans on a single historical example rather than varied concrete trigger phrases, placing it just below the 5-anchor.	4 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	It includes 'historical power transitions' and 'targeted action' plus a named example (Prince Guang / King Liao), but these are niche and lack common synonyms or variations a user would naturally say, matching the 3-anchor.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The narrow analytical framing ('historical power transitions through targeted action') carves a distinct niche with low conflict risk, though it could overlap slightly with general history-analysis skills, fitting the 4-anchor.	4 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: baojie/shiji-kb
Path: kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_066/SKILL.md
Commit: 6b836e3

Reviewed: 4 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.