Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced content skill with strong validation and feedback loops for high-stakes financial output. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: it is a ~298-line monolith with no bundle references where templates and matrices could be split out.
Suggestions
Move the reusable 操盘建议模板 and 预期差矩阵 into a references/ file (e.g. references/trading-template.md) and link to it from the body, so the overview stays lean.
Extract the macro-data indicator table and stock-selection checklist into a separate reference so the core workflow steps remain scannable.
Tighten repeated methodology restatements (e.g., the expected-difference quadrant explanations and core-principles recap) to reduce token cost without losing the actionable thresholds.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Efficient and dense with concrete tables/templates, assuming finance-domain competence; only minor instances (e.g., quadrant emoji explanations and restated core principles) that could be trimmed. Not a 5 because a few sections restate methodology a user of this skill would already infer. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: threshold tables (VIX<15/15-20/>25), a stock-selection checklist, a copy-paste-ready 操盘建议 template with fields like 买入区间/止损位/分段止盈, and a complete output-format template. Specific examples cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 5-step sequence (宏观定仓 → 中观定方向 → 微观选股 → 撰写操盘建议 → 数据验证与校验) with an explicit validation step (Step 5 self-check checklists), feedback loops (前提假设崩塌 → 备选判断; 写入失败则对话输出), and scenario-falsification signals. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Internal section structure (clear ## headers, tables, templates) is good, but no bundle files exist and no external references are signaled; large reusable blocks (操盘建议 template, 预期差 matrix) are inlined that could live in references/. Not a 4 because there is no file-level disclosure at all. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |