CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

industry-deep-explainer

系统性'讲透'一个行业的深度分析技能。覆盖产业链分布、利润分布、代表企业、人货场、供需连接, 并推演不合理点、机会点、入局策略(产品/客群/商业模式/定价)、竞争对手与合作伙伴。触发场景: 讲透/分析XX行业、XX产业链、XX行业机会、如何进入XX行业、XX赛道分析、我想做XX怎么切入等。输出图文并茂的深度分析报告到当前项目 markdown/ 目录。

73

Quality

90%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-architected instruction skill: a clearly sequenced 5-step workflow with mandatory validation checkpoints, concrete search/checklist guidance, and clean one-level-deep progressive disclosure to real reference files. The only slack is mild verbosity in the inline theory bibliography and the data-self-check example, which could be trimmed or offloaded to a reference.

Suggestions

Move the full 理论框架 bibliography (波特/施振荣/克里斯滕森/摩尔/里斯/蒂斯/巴尼) into references/framework.md and keep only a one-line pointer in SKILL.md to reduce token weight on the overview.

Relocate the verbose CAGR worked example ('970 × 1.38^5 = 5238 亿…') into references/data-sources.md, leaving the formula and the three contradiction-types checklist inline.

Tighten the search-query block to a single representative example plus a pointer to references/data-sources.md for the full query set, since that file already exists for this purpose.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and mostly instruction rather than concept-explanation, but it carries some padding — the full bulleted theory bibliography (波特/施振荣/克里斯滕森…) and the verbose '数据自洽性检查' worked example — that earns its place yet could be tightened or moved to a reference. It is clearly above the mostly-efficient score-3 anchor but not fully lean.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, executable guidance dominates: exact search-query templates, the CAGR self-check formula with a worked example, a fixed output path, length/visual quotas, and a pre-write checklist. Minor gaps (e.g. no literal code/commands, only natural-language steps) keep it just below 5, but it is firmly above the score-3 pseudocode anchor.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced 5-step workflow with explicit validation checkpoints: Step 2 mandates web-search verification of out-of-date training data, §1.1 is a hard '落地前必做' data-self-consistency check with a feedback instruction ('发现矛盾立即重查原始来源'), and Step 5 closes with a pre-publish checklist — matching the score-5 anchor of explicit validation plus feedback loops.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a concise overview that signals one-level-deep references to four real bundle files (framework.md, output-template.md, visualization-guide.md, data-sources.md), each linked at the relevant step and re-listed in a 资源文件 section; all referenced files exist and no nesting beyond one level is used, matching the score-5 anchor.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, comprehensive description that explicitly states both what the skill does and when to use it via natural trigger phrases. Its only weakness is mild distinctiveness risk against sibling industry-analysis skills, which the description itself does not fully resolve.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete analytical actions — '产业链分布、利润分布、代表企业、人货场、供需连接' plus the full '推演' chain (不合理点、机会点、入局策略、产品/客群/商业模式/定价、竞争对手与合作伙伴), giving comprehensive coverage of what the skill does.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (the analytical coverage and report output) and 'when' (a dedicated 触发场景 clause with concrete trigger phrases) and notes the output destination, matching the score-5 anchor pattern.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The 触发场景 clause enumerates natural phrases a user would say — '讲透/分析XX行业、XX产业链、XX行业机会、如何进入XX行业、XX赛道分析、我想做XX怎么切入' — covering synonyms and phrasings rather than jargon.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche (战略顾问+创业者, full 入局推演 + 图文并茂报告) is fairly distinct, but the broad '行业分析' framing overlaps with adjacent skills like industry-chain-analyst and industry-insight-writer; the description relies on the body, not the description itself, to draw that boundary, so it is not a clean 5.

4 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
digoal/blog
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.