Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable instruction skill with a clear multi-step workflow and a quality checklist. The main gaps are minor redundancy in the writing-requirements section and the lack of an explicit verify-and-fix feedback loop around the output checklist.
Suggestions
Convert the 质量自检清单 into an explicit feedback loop: run the checklist, fix any failing item, and re-check before finalizing the Markdown file.
Dedupe the 3.2 "严禁" list against the earlier "绝对不要"/写作要求 items to tighten the body.
Add a brief concrete method for generating the SVG files (e.g. a tool or template note) so the chart requirement is fully actionable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence, but the 3.2 "严禁" list and the example expert table partly duplicate guidance already given in earlier sections, leaving minor trim opportunities. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance throughout — a per-expert analysis framework, chart-type specs with fenced examples, file naming conventions, and a file-header template — though as an instruction-only generation skill it stops short of executable code for SVG creation. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence with a pipeline diagram and a quality self-check checklist, but the checklist is a one-pass review rather than an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop, so checkpoints are not fully explicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single-file skill with no bundle files and no nested references, organized into clearly headed sections (Steps 1–4, checklist, examples); per the simple-skill exception, well-organized sections alone merit a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |