Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured instruction-only skill: the three-phase workflow is clearly sequenced, guidance is concrete (question bank, report skeleton, file naming, chart rules), and token efficiency is respected via tables. The main gaps are mild redundancy between the profile-format and report-structure sections, no final output-validation step, and a monolithic single file where a question bank / template reference could reduce context load.
Suggestions
Add a final validation pass to 阶段三 (e.g., a checklist confirming every claim cites a data source, core assumptions are listed at the top, and each Top-3 opportunity has a concrete 'first action'), turning the workflow from sequenced to checkpointed.
Merge the 1.2 画像输出格式 block into the 3.1 报告结构 section (or make 1.2 a one-line pointer) to remove the duplicated skeleton and reduce tokens.
Move the profiling question bank (the two dimension tables) and the full report template into references/ files (e.g., references/profiling-questions.md, references/report-template.md), keeping SKILL.md as a lean process overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and table-driven with no padding explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the 1.2 画像输出格式 block substantially restates the 3.1 报告结构 skeleton, and a few lines ('每个主要论点都需要 ✅…') repeat prior sections — anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste-ready artifacts: an interview question bank with specific probes ('30% 概率 10 倍回报 vs 100% 概率平稳回报'), a full report markdown skeleton, an explicit output path convention, and per-chart-type rules. Some directives remain topical rather than methodical ('市场规模、增速、主要参与者、利润分布' names what to analyze but not how), matching anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-phase sequence (画像构建 → 战略研判 → 报告生成) with an input checkpoint ('不足的维度需主动追问…不要一次问超过 3 个问题') and a deficiency-handling rule with a field priority order. Minor gap: no validation step for the generated report itself (e.g., checking that every module actually has data support and assumptions listed), so it sits at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the single file is cleanly hierarchical (three phases → numbered subsections → tables) making navigation easy. At ~190 lines, the profiling question bank and the report template are candidates for reference files, which is the minor gap that keeps this at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |