Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, instruction-only skill that gives Claude a concrete, sequenced recipe for producing a personalized planning report — clear dimensions, output template, and quality rules. The main gaps are the absence of an explicit error-recovery feedback loop and the opportunity to offload the long report template into a reference file.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation feedback loop, e.g. after drafting the report: verify each section has data sources and stated assumptions, and re-prompt the user for any missing high-priority dimension (行业/职业 > 年龄/地点 > 财务/家庭) before finalizing.
Consider moving the full report outline (3.1) and the dimension tables into a reference file (e.g. references/report-template.md) and signaling it from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure and reduce inline token load.
Tighten abstract analysis bullets (e.g. '行业现状：市场规模、增速…') with one concrete method or data source hint each so the 'how' matches the concreteness of the output template.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient, skill-specific framework (dimension tables, report templates, chart rules) with little explanation of concepts Claude already knows; a few slightly padded lines like '将提问者提供的信息转化为一份专业、深度、可执行…的建议书' could be trimmed, keeping it just shy of lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, actionable guidance throughout — collection dimensions with key questions, a full Markdown report outline, Mermaid chart-type rules, file-path naming, and writing-style constraints — with minor gaps where analysis methodology (e.g. '行业现状' bullets) names what to cover rather than how. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced three-stage process (画像构建 → 战略研判 → 报告生成) with an explicit info-gate ('不足的维度需主动追问…分批进行') and a 注意事项 checklist, but lacks an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop (only a contingency mechanism for failed assumptions). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized self-contained SKILL.md with clear staged section headers and no nested references; no bundle files are present, and the large inline report template (3.1) and dimension tables could optionally be split into reference files, leaving a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |