Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable instruction-only skill with concrete search queries, output templates, and a validation checklist. Scores are capped at 4 across the board due to minor redundancy, the inherently directional nature of style guidance, the absence of a true error-recovery feedback loop, and a single-file layout that slightly exceeds the simple-skill threshold.
Suggestions
Consolidate the neutrality guidance: the 禁止事项 list and the 中立性校验 checklist overlap — merge into one checklist to remove redundancy.
Split the chart usage guide (Mermaid/ASCII/SVG examples) and the detailed article-structure template into a separate reference file to better fit the progressive-disclosure pattern for a skill over 50 lines.
Add an explicit validate→fix→retry loop around the neutrality self-check (e.g., if any checkbox fails, revise the offending section and re-run the checklist before output) to strengthen the workflow feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and free of concepts Claude already knows, but contains minor redundancy (neutrality guidance repeated across 禁止事项 and 中立性校验) and a few aphoristic lines ('顾问的价值 = 独立判断 + 信息优势 + 不怕说真话') that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance throughout — exact search query strings, per-section word-count ranges, output path template './markdown/[产品名]-advisor-[YYYYMMDD].md', a standards table, and before/after example sentences — with only minor gaps typical of instruction-only style guidance. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced steps with an explicit validation gate (the '中立性校验' checklist requiring '全部 ✅ 才可输出') and a data-fabrication guardrail, but no true validate→fix→retry error-recovery loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single self-contained file with clear section headers and no nested references; well-organized, though over 50 lines with some content (chart usage guide, detailed structure template) that could be split into reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |