Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-built instruction-only skill body: fully executable templates and exact output/file specifications, a clearly sequenced workflow with data-integrity guardrails, and exemplary progressive disclosure into two accurately-described reference files. The main gaps are the absence of an output-validation step (checking that generated SVG assets exist and match referenced paths) and a few dimension/style sections that could be trimmed for token efficiency.
Suggestions
Add a post-generation validation step, e.g., 'verify every image reference in the report resolves to a file in markdown/assets/ and every H2 section from the template has substantive content before reporting completion', to close the workflow_clarity gap.
Tighten the evaluation-dimension bullet lists in 第三步 (e.g., collapse '响应速度、并发处理、已知故障记录' style enumerations) since Claude can expand these from the dimension names alone, improving token efficiency.
Move the detailed SVG color/font specifications into references/report-examples.md alongside the chart templates, keeping only the file-naming and external-reference rule inline, to further slim the always-loaded SKILL.md body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely efficient: it never explains concepts Claude already knows (it names TCO, GDPR, SOC2 without defining them) and every section carries instructions. Minor over-explanation remains — e.g., the evaluation-dimension lists ('响应速度、并发处理、已知故障记录') restate common knowledge per dimension, and '适合流程图、时序图…' plus the writing-style items could be tightened. This fits the score-4 anchor ('efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed') rather than 5, since not every token earns its place, and clearly above 3 where unnecessary explanation is more than incidental. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The guidance is fully executable for an instruction-only skill: an exact output file tree ('markdown/product-review-{产品名}-{YYYYMMDD}.md', named SVG assets), a copy-paste-ready report structure template down to H2/H3 headings, a literal image-reference snippet (''), exact SVG specs (viewBox, hex colors, font-family, 6–8 radar axes), and Mermaid fences. Specific examples cover the common cases, matching the score-5 anchor; it is not 4 because there are no meaningful gaps in executable detail. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence (询问信息 → 搜集研究 → 维度评测 → 竞品对比 → 生成报告 → 输出后提示) with an anti-fabrication checkpoint ('不要捏造数据。若无法查到某项数据…如实说明') and explicit instruction to skip re-asking for already-provided info. It does not reach 5 because there is no validation of the generated output (e.g., verifying the SVG files exist at the referenced paths and that every template H2 section has content) and no error-recovery loop; it stays above 3 because the sequence is explicit and a data-integrity checkpoint is present, and the operation is not destructive/batch so the ≤3 cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a well-structured overview: workflow, evaluation framework, output structure, and style rules inline, with the bulky detail (scoring rubric per dimension, radar-chart SVG template, feature-matrix template) correctly split into 'references/scoring-rubric.md' and 'references/report-examples.md'. Both files exist, are one level deep, and are clearly signaled with per-file descriptions of their contents, exactly matching the score-5 anchor; it is not 4 because references are not merely 'mostly clear' — each is labeled with what it contains and nothing that belongs in a reference is inlined wholesale. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |