Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill body with a clear multi-step workflow and clean progressive disclosure into two reference files. The only real weakness is minor verbosity in the writing-style section and the absence of an explicit output-validation loop.
Suggestions
Tighten or trim the '写作风格要求' section to domain-specific guidance only, dropping generic principles like '结论前置' and '量化优先' that Claude already follows.
Add an explicit validation/verification step before emitting the report — e.g. 'Confirm every H2 section has substantive content, every claim has a cited source, and all referenced SVG files exist in markdown/assets/ before declaring the report complete.'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and directive, but the '写作风格要求' section restates fairly obvious principles ('结论前置', '不粉饰缺点', '量化优先') that Claude already applies; minor trimming possible. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly actionable for an instruction-only skill: names specific tools (web_search/web_fetch) and sources, provides a copy-paste-ready report structure template, and pins exact chart specs (viewBox, hex colors #2563EB/#10B981/#EF4444, font-family, 6–8 radar dims, 5-point scale). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence (收集→搜集→维度→竞品→生成) with content/data-quality gates ('每个 H2 章节均需有实质内容', cite sources, don't fabricate), but no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop before emitting the report. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview in SKILL.md with a '参考文件' section signaling two real one-level-deep references — scoring-rubric.md (scoring detail) and report-examples.md (SVG/feature-matrix templates) — both verified present in references/. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |