Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill body: the workflow is explicitly sequenced with a rigorous evidence gate, exact output specifications, and a concrete article template. The main cost is redundancy — background-bridging, anti-template-heading, and evidence-sufficiency rules are each stated two to three times across sections, which inflates the token budget without adding guidance.
Suggestions
State the transition-background rule once (in Workflow step 5) and drop its repeats in step 2 and the Quality Bar; a single "short background bridging the reader into the news" instruction suffices.
Merge the Article Shape heading guidance ("Do not reuse fixed second-level headings") and the Quality Bar's template-fatigue list ("不是简单的...", "我更看重...", etc.) into one place, keeping the concrete banned-phrase examples.
Fold the Quality Bar's evidence-sufficiency bullet ("Do not write an article when timely product-specific evidence is insufficient") into Workflow step 3's gate, which already fully specifies the behavior, or trim step 3's overlap so the rule lives in exactly one section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient procedural guidance, but several instructions are repeated across sections: the "brief transition background before the news" rule appears in Workflow step 2, step 5, and the Quality Bar; anti-template-heading guidance appears in both Article Shape ("Do not reuse fixed second-level headings") and Quality Bar ("Avoid template fatigue..."); and the insufficient-evidence rule is stated in step 3 and again in the Quality Bar. Matches anchor 3 ("mostly efficient but... could be tightened") rather than anchor 4, since consolidating these would cut a noticeable fraction of the ~100 lines. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is fully concrete: exact evidence thresholds ("2 or more credible product-specific sources from the last 30 days", or "1... plus 2 or more recent supporting sources"), a verbatim refusal string ("未生成文章：近 30 天缺少足够、可信、可写成文章的产品相关证据。"), a filename pattern ("产品名-技术影响力短文-YYYYMMDD.md"), length bounds ("under 4 phone screens, roughly 900-1500 Chinese characters"), and a full article-shape template. This is copy-paste-ready guidance covering the common cases, matching anchor 5; absence of code is not penalized per the code-vs-instruction scoring note. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step workflow is clearly sequenced with an explicit validation checkpoint: step 3's evidence gate ("Apply the evidence gate before writing", "Continue only when...") with explicit sufficient/insufficient criteria and a defined refusal output, plus a clarification-question rule in step 1. This matches anchor 5's "explicit validation steps; feedback loops... checklists"; the gate's terminal stop behavior is intentional design, not a missing retry loop, and the operation is not destructive/batch. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the body is well organized into Goal / Workflow / Article Shape / Quality Bar with nothing buried. This fits anchor 4 ("Good structure; most content is appropriately placed; minor organization gaps") rather than anchor 5, whose framing (and the scoring note's under-50-lines exception) applies to reference-structured or clearly minimal skills; at ~100 lines, the Article Shape template and Quality Bar list could plausibly live in a reference file, though inline is defensible. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |