product-tech-influence-article
Write a concise, source-backed Chinese WeChat-ready Markdown article that helps raise a product's technical influence from a neutral third-party advisor perspective, but stop without writing when recent evidence is insufficient. Use when the user provides a product name and asks for recent-news-based product influence writing, product technology commentary, product industry interpretation, brand-neutral technical positioning, or a short public-account article saved under the current project's markdown directory.
61
73%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./skills/product-tech-influence-article/SKILL.mdLow
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).
What this means
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Why it was flagged
SKILL.md’s required workflow step “Search current evidence” implies fetching web news/public sources at runtime and then using their text (evidence + source URLs) to write the article, so outsider-authored free-form web content can be ingested into the LLM context via the evidence-gathering portion.
- Repository
- digoal/blog
- Commit
3b9c83d
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.