claude-octopus

Reverse-engineer design systems, tokens, and components from live products or screenshots

Environment diagnostics — check providers, auth, config, hooks, scheduler, and more

Post-ship doc sync across project markdown. Use when: sync docs, update docs, document changes, release notes.

Convert markdown to DOCX, PPTX, XLSX, PDF office documents — use when you need exportable deliverables

Persist design documents with branch tracking, revision chains, and cross-session discovery

Generate slide deck presentations from briefs — use when you need slides, pitch decks, or visual summaries

Present options with trade-offs for informed decision-making — use when choosing between approaches

Debug issues methodically — use when stuck on errors, test failures, or unexpected behavior

Structured multi-provider AI debates between Claude and available advisors — use for critical decisions

Trace codepaths in diffs, map against tests, auto-generate missing coverage — use before shipping PRs

Run a configurable multi-LLM council with personas, budget caps, synthesis, veto gates, and optional implementation handoff.

Project remaining workflow cost from per-phase averages — warns on budget ceiling overruns

GitHub Copilot CLI as optional zero-cost provider via copilot -p programmatic mode

Auto-detect work context (Dev vs Knowledge) — use to tailor workflows based on current task type

Extract patterns and anatomy from URLs — use to reverse-engineer content strategies from live pages

Expert multi-AI code review with inline PR comments — use for thorough quality and security analysis

OpenClaw instance administration — manage hosts across macOS, Ubuntu/Debian, Docker, OCI, and Proxmox

Audit codebases for quality, consistency, and broken patterns — use for pre-release or tech debt review

Design UI/UX systems with style guides, palettes, typography, and component specs for new interfaces

Starter: one-screen provider health summary — availability, auth method, version drift, and cost posture for every seatable provider

Starter: compare model costs for a described task — maps task shape to the cheapest adequate seat and shows the price spread

Starter: frame a decision as a multi-model debate — picks sides, seats providers, and launches /octo:debate with a well-formed motion

Starter: interpret a council run's verdict artifacts — quorum, dissent, cross-lab validity, and what to do next

OWASP compliance, vulnerability scanning, and adversarial red team testing — use for security reviews

Thorough research across multiple sources — use for complex topics needing broad synthesis