CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit

Comprehensive developer toolkit providing reusable skills for Java/Spring Boot, TypeScript/NestJS/React/Next.js, Python, PHP, AWS CloudFormation, AI/RAG, DevOps, and more.

89

Quality

89%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Risky

Do not use without reviewing

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Discovery

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a strong skill description that clearly defines what the skill does (creates ADR documents with consistent templates and repository-aware guidance) and when to use it (architectural changes, documenting rationale, adding ADRs). It uses natural trigger terms that users would actually say and occupies a distinct niche that minimizes conflict with other skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists specific concrete actions: creates ADR documents, uses a consistent template, provides repository-aware naming and storage guidance. These are multiple distinct, concrete capabilities.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (creates ADR documents using consistent template with repository-aware naming/storage) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause covering architectural changes, documenting technical rationale, or adding new ADRs).

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes strong natural trigger terms: 'Architecture Decision Record', 'ADR', 'architectural change', 'technical rationale', 'document', 'project history'. Users would naturally use terms like 'ADR', 'architectural decision', or 'document technical rationale'.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Very distinct niche — specifically about creating ADR documents with a particular template and naming convention. Unlikely to conflict with general documentation or code generation skills due to the specific ADR focus.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Implementation

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-structured skill with clear phased workflow, explicit validation checkpoints (user approval before file creation), and good progressive disclosure via external references. Its main weakness is moderate verbosity—the overview, 'When to Use' section, and some instructions contain redundant explanations that could be trimmed without losing clarity. The actionability is strong with concrete paths, patterns, and a complete template.

Suggestions

Remove or significantly trim the 'When to Use' section, as it largely restates the overview and description—a single sentence would suffice.

Consolidate the opening overview paragraph to remove explanations of what ADRs are (Claude already knows this) and focus only on what's unique about this skill's approach.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is reasonably well-written but includes some unnecessary verbosity. The 'When to Use' section largely repeats the overview, the 'Overview' section explains what an ADR is (which Claude already knows), and several instructions could be tightened. Phrases like 'so teams can keep a clear history of why important technical decisions were made' are filler.

2 / 3

Actionability

The skill provides concrete, specific guidance at every phase: exact directory paths to search, specific filename patterns, a complete markdown template, clear enumerated steps for discovery and drafting, and explicit rules about what to do when conventions exist vs. don't. The instructions are directly executable.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The five-phase workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints: Phase 1 confirms inputs, Phase 4 requires user review before writing, and Phase 5 creates the file only after approval. The feedback loop (revise draft if user wants adjustments) is explicitly stated. Scope boundaries are clearly defined throughout.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill appropriately references external files (`references/template.md` and `references/examples.md`) for detailed content while keeping the main skill focused on the workflow. References are one level deep and clearly signaled. The content is well-organized with logical section headers.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Reviewed

Table of Contents