CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit

Comprehensive developer toolkit providing reusable skills for Java/Spring Boot, TypeScript/NestJS/React/Next.js, Python, PHP, AWS CloudFormation, AI/RAG, DevOps, and more.

89

Quality

89%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Risky

Do not use without reviewing

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Discovery

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a strong skill description that clearly communicates what the skill does (WireMock Docker container patterns, mock endpoints, stub mappings, error simulation) and when to use it (mocking APIs, stubbing services, integration testing). It uses third-person voice consistently, includes excellent trigger terms covering natural user language variations, and occupies a distinct niche that minimizes conflict risk with other skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'running WireMock as a standalone Docker container', 'generates mock HTTP endpoints', 'creates stub mappings', 'validates integration scenarios', 'simulates error conditions'. These are detailed and actionable.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (provides patterns for WireMock Docker, generates mock endpoints, creates stub mappings, validates integration scenarios, simulates errors) and 'when' with an explicit 'Use when...' clause listing specific trigger scenarios.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Excellent coverage of natural terms users would say: 'mock APIs', 'mock server', 'stub external services', 'simulate third-party APIs', 'fake API responses', 'integration testing', 'WireMock', 'Docker'. These cover many natural variations of how users would phrase their needs.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly distinctive with a clear niche: WireMock + Docker + API mocking/stubbing. The combination of the specific tool (WireMock), deployment method (Docker container), and purpose (mock HTTP endpoints, stub mappings) makes it very unlikely to conflict with other skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Implementation

64%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a solid, actionable skill with concrete examples and a clear step-by-step workflow for setting up WireMock in Docker. Its main weaknesses are moderate verbosity (the 'When to Use' and 'Overview' sections add little value for Claude), and the workflow lacks explicit validation feedback loops between steps. The progressive disclosure could be improved by either trimming inline content or better signaling what the referenced files contain.

Suggestions

Remove or significantly trim the 'When to Use' and 'Overview' sections — Claude can infer applicability from the skill description and content itself.

Add explicit validation checkpoints in the workflow, e.g., after Step 3 verify stubs loaded correctly with `curl /__admin/mappings | jq '.mappings | length'` before proceeding to test.

Clarify what's in the `references/` directory — list specific filenames and what each demonstrates, or consolidate if they duplicate inline examples.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Generally efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation (e.g., 'When to Use' section restates what Claude would infer from context, and some best practices are generic advice Claude already knows). The overview paragraph largely repeats the description. Could be tightened.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides fully executable docker-compose YAML, concrete JSON stub definitions, specific curl commands for verification, and copy-paste ready examples covering success, error, and timeout scenarios.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Steps are clearly sequenced (1-7) with a verification step (Step 5), but there's no explicit validation/feedback loop for when stubs don't match or containers fail to start properly. The troubleshooting section partially compensates but isn't integrated into the workflow as checkpoints.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

References a `references/` directory at the end for complete examples, which is good, but the main file is fairly long with inline examples that could be split out. The reference to 'references/' is vague — it's unclear what files exist there or how they differ from the inline examples.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Reviewed

Table of Contents