CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit

Comprehensive developer toolkit providing reusable skills for Java/Spring Boot, TypeScript/NestJS/React/Next.js, Python, PHP, AWS CloudFormation, AI/RAG, DevOps, and more.

89

Quality

89%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Risky

Do not use without reviewing

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Discovery

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a strong skill description that clearly defines its scope around NestJS code review, lists specific framework components it analyzes, and provides explicit trigger conditions. It uses proper third-person voice and includes both natural language triggers and specific use-case scenarios. The description is comprehensive without being unnecessarily verbose.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions and NestJS-specific components: analyzing controllers, services, modules, guards, interceptors, pipes, dependency injection, and database integration patterns.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (comprehensive code review analyzing specific NestJS components) and 'when' (reviewing code changes, before merging PRs, after implementing features, architecture validation) with explicit trigger phrases.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural keywords users would say: 'review NestJS code', 'NestJS code review', 'check my NestJS controller/service', 'pull requests', 'architecture validation'. Good coverage of NestJS-specific terms like controllers, services, guards, interceptors, pipes.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly specific to NestJS applications with framework-specific terminology (guards, interceptors, pipes, dependency injection). Unlikely to conflict with generic code review skills or other framework-specific review skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Implementation

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a strong, well-structured NestJS code review skill with excellent actionability through concrete before/after code examples and a clear multi-step workflow with a validation checkpoint. The progressive disclosure is well-handled with references to external checklists. The main weakness is moderate verbosity — the best practices section largely duplicates what the examples already demonstrate, and some content could be tightened without losing clarity.

Suggestions

Consider removing or significantly condensing the 'Best Practices' section since most points are already demonstrated in the code examples, reducing token usage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is generally well-structured but somewhat verbose. The five detailed code examples, while useful, add significant length. The 'Best Practices' section largely restates what's already demonstrated in the examples and instructions. Some items in 'When to Use' repeat the overview.

2 / 3

Actionability

Highly actionable with concrete, executable TypeScript code examples showing both bad and good patterns across five different review areas. The instructions provide specific steps (use glob/grep, check constructor injection, verify DTOs), and the output format is clearly defined with structured sections.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The 9-step workflow is clearly sequenced from scope identification through report generation. Step 8 is an explicit validation checkpoint requiring reproducible evidence before finalizing findings, which serves as a proper feedback loop for this type of review task.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill provides a clear overview and workflow inline, with detailed pattern references delegated to one-level-deep files (references/patterns.md, references/anti-patterns.md, references/checklist.md). Navigation is well-signaled and the content split is appropriate.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Reviewed

Table of Contents