CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit

Comprehensive developer toolkit providing reusable skills for Java/Spring Boot, TypeScript/NestJS/React/Next.js, Python, PHP, AWS CloudFormation, AI/RAG, DevOps, and more.

89

Quality

89%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Risky

Do not use without reviewing

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Discovery

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a strong skill description that clearly communicates its scope (Spring Boot testing patterns), lists specific tools and testing types, and includes an explicit 'Use when' clause with natural trigger terms. It is well-differentiated from general coding or non-Spring testing skills, and covers both the 'what' and 'when' dimensions effectively.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions and concepts: unit testing, integration testing, slice testing, container-based testing, and names specific tools (JUnit 5, Mockito, Testcontainers). Also mentions performance optimization in the testing context.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (comprehensive testing patterns covering unit, integration, slice, and container-based testing with specific frameworks) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when writing tests, @Test methods, @MockBean mocks, or implementing test suites for Spring Boot applications').

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes strong natural trigger terms users would say: 'tests', '@Test', '@MockBean', 'mocks', 'test suites', 'Spring Boot', 'JUnit 5', 'Mockito', 'Testcontainers', 'unit', 'integration'. These cover common variations of how users would phrase testing-related requests.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clearly scoped to Spring Boot testing specifically, with distinct triggers like '@MockBean', '@Test', 'Testcontainers', and 'Spring Boot applications' that would not easily conflict with general coding skills or non-Spring testing skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Implementation

72%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-structured skill with excellent actionability and progressive disclosure — code examples are executable and references are clearly organized. The main weaknesses are moderate verbosity (annotation lists, 'When to Use' section, and inline content that could be deferred to references) and workflow clarity that lacks strong feedback loops for error recovery despite covering potentially complex multi-step testing setups.

Suggestions

Remove the 'Core Concepts' and 'Key Annotations' sections — the quick reference table already covers test types, and Claude knows what these annotations do. This would significantly reduce token usage.

Trim or remove the 'When to Use' section; the skill description and quick reference table already convey when to apply these patterns.

Strengthen the Validation Checkpoints section with explicit error recovery steps (e.g., 'If context fails to load: check for conflicting @MockBean configurations → consolidate test configurations → retry').

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill includes some unnecessary sections like the 'When to Use' list (Claude can infer this), the 'Core Concepts' section partially restates the quick reference table, and the annotation lists explain things Claude already knows. The CI/CD section and dependency listing add bulk that could be deferred to references. However, the code examples themselves are lean.

2 / 3

Actionability

All code examples are fully executable and copy-paste ready — unit tests with Mockito, slice tests with @DataJpaTest, controller tests with MockMvc, Testcontainers configuration, Maven dependencies, and CI/CD YAML. Each pattern includes concrete, complete code that can be directly used.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The numbered sections (1-6) provide a reasonable sequence, and there is a 'Validation Checkpoints' section. However, the validation steps are basic (check docker ps, check logs) and lack explicit feedback loops for error recovery. The workflow is more of a catalog of patterns than a clear sequential process with checkpoints between steps.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Excellent progressive disclosure with a clear overview, concise inline examples for each pattern, and well-signaled one-level-deep references to 8 separate files covering dependencies, unit testing, slice testing, testcontainers, CI/CD, API reference, best practices, and workflow patterns. Navigation is easy and references are clearly labeled.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Reviewed

Table of Contents