CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit

Comprehensive developer toolkit providing reusable skills for Java/Spring Boot, TypeScript/NestJS/React/Next.js, Python, PHP, AWS CloudFormation, AI/RAG, DevOps, and more.

89

Quality

89%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Risky

Do not use without reviewing

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Discovery

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a strong skill description that clearly defines its scope (Spring MVC controller unit testing), lists specific capabilities (request/response mapping, validation, exception handling, HTTP status codes), and provides explicit trigger guidance with natural keywords. The description is concise, uses third person voice correctly, and would be easily distinguishable from other testing-related skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'unit testing REST controllers using MockMvc and @WebMvcTest', 'validates request/response mapping, validation, exception handling, and HTTP status codes'. These are concrete, well-defined capabilities.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (provides patterns for unit testing REST controllers, generates tests for request/response mapping, validation, exception handling, HTTP status codes) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause with multiple trigger scenarios).

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes strong natural keywords users would say: 'MockMvc', '@WebMvcTest', 'REST controllers', 'API endpoint testing', 'Spring MVC tests', 'mock HTTP requests', 'controller layer unit tests'. Good coverage of both specific framework terms and general concepts.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly specific niche: Spring MVC controller testing with MockMvc and @WebMvcTest. The combination of framework-specific annotations and the focus on web layer isolation makes it clearly distinguishable from general testing skills or integration testing skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Implementation

64%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a solid, highly actionable skill with excellent executable code examples covering a comprehensive range of MockMvc testing patterns. Its main weaknesses are verbosity — many examples cover patterns Claude already knows how to generate — and the lack of progressive disclosure for what is a lengthy document. The validation workflow could be more explicit with clearer debugging checkpoints.

Suggestions

Consolidate the simpler examples (PUT, DELETE, path variables, query params) into a concise reference table or a single combined example to reduce token usage while preserving coverage.

Move the full code examples into a separate EXAMPLES.md file and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview with the basic GET pattern and links to detailed examples.

Remove the 'Overview' and 'When to Use' sections as they duplicate the skill description and title — Claude doesn't need this repeated context.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The 'Overview' and 'When to Use' sections repeat information already conveyed by the skill's title and description. The examples are well-structured but numerous — some (PUT, DELETE, path variables) are patterns Claude already knows and could be condensed into a brief table or single combined example. The best practices section also states things Claude would already know.

2 / 3

Actionability

All examples are fully executable Java code with correct imports, annotations, and assertions. The patterns cover GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, query params, path variables, validation, headers, auth, and content negotiation — all copy-paste ready with concrete assertions.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The numbered instructions provide a reasonable sequence, and there's a brief validation workflow (run test → add print() → check → fix). However, the validation workflow is a single inline line rather than an explicit feedback loop with checkpoints. For a testing skill, the workflow is adequate but the debugging/validation guidance is minimal.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The content is well-sectioned with clear headers, but it's a long monolithic file (~200 lines of examples) that could benefit from splitting detailed examples into a separate reference file. The external references at the bottom are good, but there's no internal progressive disclosure — everything is inline.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Reviewed

Table of Contents