CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

igmarin/rails-agent-skills

Curated library of 42 public AI agent skills for Ruby on Rails development, plus 5 callable workflow skills. Organized by category: planning, testing, code-quality, ddd, engines, infrastructure, api, patterns, context, orchestration, and workflows. Covers code review, architecture, security, testing (RSpec), engines, service objects, DDD patterns, and TDD automation.

75

Quality

94%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Discovery

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is an excellent skill description that clearly defines both what the skill does and when to use it. It uses natural Rails developer terminology as trigger terms and lists specific, concrete actions. The description is concise, uses third person voice, and carves out a distinct niche that would be easily distinguishable from other skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: recommending service object extractions, simplifying callback chains, identifying abstraction quality issues, producing severity-classified findings with smallest credible improvements.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (recommends service object extractions, simplifies callback chains, identifies abstraction quality issues, produces severity-classified findings) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause covering reviewing Rails structure, identifying fat models/controllers, auditing callbacks, etc.).

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes strong natural keywords users would say: 'Rails', 'fat models', 'fat controllers', 'callbacks', 'concerns', 'service extraction', 'domain boundaries', 'Rails architecture', 'service object'. These are terms Rails developers naturally use when seeking architecture advice.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly distinctive with a clear niche in Rails architecture review. The specific focus on fat models/controllers, callbacks, concerns, service extraction, and domain boundaries makes it unlikely to conflict with general code review or non-Rails skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Implementation

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is an excellent skill that demonstrates strong content quality across all dimensions. It is concise yet comprehensive, providing actionable guidance with concrete examples, a clear review workflow with verification checkpoints, and well-organized sections. The pitfalls table is a particularly strong addition that prevents common mistakes without being verbose.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The content is lean and efficient throughout. It assumes Claude knows Rails conventions and doesn't explain what controllers, models, or callbacks are. Every section earns its place — the quick reference table, severity definitions, and pitfalls table all add unique value without redundancy.

3 / 3

Actionability

The skill provides concrete, specific guidance: a structured output format with a real example, a concrete code example showing a bad callback pattern with a specific fix, severity classification criteria with precise conditions, and a clear review order. The four-field finding structure is copy-paste ready.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The 7-step review order is clearly sequenced and includes an explicit verification checkpoint (step 7) that requires code-level confirmation before reporting High-severity findings. This is a genuine feedback loop — findings that don't survive verification are downgraded or removed. The pitfalls table adds additional guardrails against common workflow errors.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

For a skill with no bundle files, the content is well-organized into clearly delineated sections (Quick Reference, Review Order, Severity Levels, Output Format, Pitfalls) that are easy to scan. The content is appropriately sized for a single file — nothing here warrants splitting into separate documents. Tables and headers provide clear navigation.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

Table of Contents