CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

igmarin/rails-agent-skills

Curated library of 42 public AI agent skills for Ruby on Rails development, plus 5 callable workflow skills. Organized by category: planning, testing, code-quality, ddd, engines, infrastructure, api, patterns, context, orchestration, and workflows. Covers code review, architecture, security, testing (RSpec), engines, service objects, DDD patterns, and TDD automation.

75

Quality

94%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Discovery

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is an excellent skill description that hits all the marks. It provides specific capabilities, comprehensive trigger terms covering both library names and conceptual terms, an explicit 'Use when...' clause, and a clearly defined niche that distinguishes it from general Rails or authentication skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'implement and test authorization', 'policy objects', 'role-based access control', 'permission checks', 'testing strategies'. These are concrete, actionable capabilities within a well-defined domain.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (implement and test authorization using Pundit/CanCanCan, policy objects, RBAC, permission checks, testing strategies) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when...' clause covering implementation, troubleshooting, and specific trigger terms).

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Excellent coverage of natural terms users would say: 'Pundit', 'CanCanCan', 'policy objects', 'access control', 'roles', 'permissions', 'authorization', 'Rails'. These are all terms a developer would naturally use when seeking help with this topic.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly distinctive with a clear niche: Rails authorization specifically via Pundit or CanCanCan. The combination of framework (Rails), domain (authorization), and specific libraries (Pundit, CanCanCan) makes it very unlikely to conflict with other skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Implementation

92%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-structured, actionable skill that efficiently covers Rails authorization with both Pundit and CanCanCan. It provides executable code, a clear multi-step workflow with validation, and a useful troubleshooting table. The only minor weakness is that the inline testing example adds some length that could be deferred to EXAMPLES.md, and the referenced bundle files aren't available to verify.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The content is lean and efficient. It avoids explaining what Pundit or CanCanCan are conceptually, jumps straight to patterns, commands, and code. The table format for quick reference and troubleshooting is token-efficient. Every section earns its place.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides fully executable Ruby code for both Pundit and CanCanCan patterns, specific generator commands (`rails g pundit:install`), concrete policy spec examples with multiple roles, and a clear troubleshooting table with specific error names and fixes.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The 7-step implementation workflow is clearly sequenced with an explicit validation checkpoint at step 5 (verify authorization raises expected errors). The testing step at the end closes the feedback loop. The hard-gate section adds additional safety constraints.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

References to EXAMPLES.md and references/workflow.md are well-signaled and one level deep, but since no bundle files were provided, we can't verify these exist. The SKILL.md itself includes a complete inline testing example that could arguably live in EXAMPLES.md, making the main file slightly longer than necessary.

2 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

Table of Contents