CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

igmarin/rails-agent-skills

Curated library of 42 public AI agent skills for Ruby on Rails development, plus 5 callable workflow skills. Organized by category: planning, testing, code-quality, ddd, engines, infrastructure, api, patterns, context, orchestration, and workflows. Covers code review, architecture, security, testing (RSpec), engines, service objects, DDD patterns, and TDD automation.

75

Quality

94%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Discovery

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is an excellent skill description that hits all the marks. It provides specific capabilities (design principles, per-path rules, structured logging), clearly states when to use it, and includes natural trigger terms. The scoping to Rails-specific concerns and the explicit deferral to linters for formatting helps distinguish it from other code quality skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions and domains: design principles (DRY, YAGNI, PORO, CoC, KISS), per-path rules for models/services/workers/controllers, structured logging, comment discipline, and defers style to linters. Very concrete and detailed.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (daily checklist covering design principles, per-path rules, structured logging, comment discipline) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring Ruby on Rails code, or when asked about Rails best practices, clean code, or code quality') with explicit trigger words listed.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes excellent natural trigger terms users would say: 'code review', 'refactor', 'RoR', 'clean code', 'best practices', 'Ruby on Rails conventions'. Also includes domain terms like 'models', 'services', 'controllers' that users naturally reference.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clearly scoped to Ruby on Rails clean code practices with a specific niche (design principles checklist, per-path rules). The explicit mention of Rails-specific paths (models, services, workers, controllers) and the note about deferring to linters makes it distinct from generic code quality or Ruby skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Implementation

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a high-quality skill that efficiently delivers actionable Rails code conventions. It excels at conciseness through table-driven rules, provides concrete BAD/GOOD code examples, maintains clear workflow sequences with validation gates, and uses progressive disclosure effectively by deferring specialized topics to named companion skills. The only minor note is that bundle files (assets/checklist.md, assets/snippets.md) were not provided for verification, but the references themselves are well-structured.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is lean and efficient throughout. It assumes Claude's competence with Rails, avoids explaining what Rails, ActiveRecord, or RSpec are, and every section delivers actionable rules rather than background context. The table format is particularly token-efficient.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete, executable examples for logging and comments (with explicit BAD/GOOD patterns), specific commands for linter detection, exact path patterns for area-specific rules, and a clear workflow sequence. The structured logging section is copy-paste ready with precise format requirements.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The Code Review / Refactoring Workflow section provides a clear 4-step sequence with validation checkpoints (run linter first, check area rules, verify tests gate, chain to specialized skills). The HARD-GATE tests gate adds an explicit feedback loop (write test → run → fail → implement). The N+1 guidance includes a validate-fix-rerun cycle.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Excellent structure: quick reference table for overview, detailed sections for each concern, and a clear Integration table pointing to 7 specialized skills with specific trigger conditions. Assets are referenced at the bottom. References are one level deep and well-signaled. Content is appropriately split between inline rules and deferred depth.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

Table of Contents