CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

igmarin/rails-agent-skills

Curated library of 42 public AI agent skills for Ruby on Rails development, plus 5 callable workflow skills. Organized by category: planning, testing, code-quality, ddd, engines, infrastructure, api, patterns, context, orchestration, and workflows. Covers code review, architecture, security, testing (RSpec), engines, service objects, DDD patterns, and TDD automation.

75

Quality

94%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Discovery

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a strong skill description that clearly defines its scope (Rails engine documentation), lists specific concrete actions, and provides explicit trigger terms. It follows the recommended pattern of stating when to use it upfront, describing what it does, and listing trigger words. The description is concise yet comprehensive, making it easy for Claude to select this skill appropriately.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: generates README templates, writes installation and configuration guides, documents mount points, extension APIs, and migration notes for host-app adoption.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (generates README templates, writes installation/configuration guides, documents mount points, extension APIs, migration notes) and 'when' (when writing or maintaining documentation for Rails engines), with explicit trigger words listed.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Excellent coverage of natural trigger terms that users would actually say: 'engine README', 'installation guide', 'configuration docs', 'mount instructions', 'migration notes', 'extension points', 'host integration examples', 'setup documentation'. These are natural phrases a developer working with Rails engines would use.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly distinctive niche: Rails engine documentation specifically. The combination of 'Rails engines' with documentation-specific triggers like 'mount instructions' and 'host integration examples' makes it very unlikely to conflict with general documentation or general Rails skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Implementation

92%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-crafted skill that efficiently communicates how to write Rails engine documentation. It provides concrete examples, a clear workflow with validation feedback loops, and appropriate references to supporting files. The main weakness is that the referenced bundle files (CHECKLIST.md, assets/) aren't provided, making it impossible to verify the progressive disclosure structure fully works.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The content is lean and efficient. It avoids explaining what Rails engines are or how Ruby gems work, assuming Claude's competence. Every section serves a clear purpose with no padding or unnecessary context.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete, copyable examples for installation, mounting, and configuration. The README snippet and configuration block are realistic and executable. The output style section gives specific procedural guidance for generating docs.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The output style section provides a clear sequence (minimum install → configuration → operational steps → gap checklist validation) with an explicit feedback loop: check each checklist item, fix failures, re-run until all critical items pass. This constitutes a proper validation checkpoint for the documentation generation workflow.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

References CHECKLIST.md and three asset files (configuration.md, examples.md, installation.md) which is good structure, but no bundle files were provided to verify these exist. The main content is well-organized but the recommended README shape section and the examples section contain some overlap with what could be in the referenced assets, suggesting the split could be cleaner.

2 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

Table of Contents