CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

igmarin/rails-agent-skills

Curated library of 42 public AI agent skills for Ruby on Rails development, plus 5 callable workflow skills. Organized by category: planning, testing, code-quality, ddd, engines, infrastructure, api, patterns, context, orchestration, and workflows. Covers code review, architecture, security, testing (RSpec), engines, service objects, DDD patterns, and TDD automation.

75

Quality

94%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Discovery

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a strong description that clearly defines its niche (RSpec testing for Rails engines), lists specific concrete activities, and includes an explicit 'Use when' trigger clause. The natural keywords are well-chosen for the target audience of Rails developers, and the scope is narrow enough to avoid conflicts with broader testing or Rails skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'dummy app setup, request, routing, generator, and configuration specs' — these are distinct, concrete testing activities within the Rails engine domain.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (creating/improving RSpec test coverage covering dummy app setup, request, routing, generator, and configuration specs) and 'when' ('Use when creating or improving RSpec test coverage for Rails engines').

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes strong natural keywords users would say: 'RSpec', 'test coverage', 'Rails engines', 'dummy app', 'request specs', 'routing specs', 'generator specs', 'configuration specs', 'host application'. These are terms a developer would naturally use when seeking help with engine testing.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly distinctive — the combination of 'RSpec', 'Rails engines', 'dummy app setup', and specific spec types (routing, generator, configuration) creates a very clear niche that is unlikely to conflict with general testing or general Rails skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Implementation

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-structured, actionable skill for Rails engine testing. Its strongest aspects are the clear workflow with explicit validation gates (HARD-GATE, step 3 verification) and concrete, executable code examples. Minor weaknesses include some content redundancy between sections and potentially confusing asset references (EXAMPLES.md vs assets/examples.md), plus the inability to verify referenced bundle files exist.

Suggestions

Reconcile the reference to './EXAMPLES.md' in the body with 'assets/examples.md' in the Assets section — these appear to point to different paths for potentially the same content.

Trim the Pitfalls table to remove entries that restate guidance already covered in the Testing Order and HARD-GATE sections (e.g., 'No dummy app' is already thoroughly addressed).

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Generally efficient but has some redundancy — the pitfalls table partially restates guidance already given in the testing order and minimum baseline sections. The quick reference table and integration table add useful structure without excessive verbosity, but the overall content could be tightened slightly.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides fully executable bash commands for dummy app setup and validation, complete Ruby code for request and configuration specs, and specific file paths. The guidance is concrete and copy-paste ready throughout.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequential workflow (steps 1-6) with explicit validation checkpoints: the HARD-GATE requires dummy app boot verification before proceeding, step 3 mandates passing the integration test before continuing, and step 6 provides a verification checklist. Error recovery guidance is included (check engine.rb initializer order).

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

References EXAMPLES.md and assets (dummy_app_instructions.md, examples.md) for deeper content, which is good structure. However, the bundle files are not provided, so the references cannot be validated. The SKILL.md also references both './EXAMPLES.md' and 'assets/examples.md' which appear to be different files covering similar content, creating potential confusion. The inline content is well-scoped as an overview.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

Table of Contents