agent-skills

Inspect Sentry issues, summarize production errors, and pull health data via the Sentry API (read-only). Use when user says "check Sentry", "what errors in production?", "summarize Sentry issues", "recent crashes", or "production error report". Requires SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN. Do NOT use for setting up Sentry SDK, configuring alerts, or non-Sentry error monitoring.

Optimize for search engine visibility and ranking. Use when asked to "improve SEO", "optimize for search", "fix meta tags", "add structured data", "sitemap optimization", or "search engine optimization". Do NOT use for accessibility (use web-accessibility), performance (use core-web-vitals), or comprehensive site audits covering multiple areas (use web-quality-audit).

Complete Shopify development reference covering Liquid templating, OS 2.0 themes, GraphQL APIs, Hydrogen, Functions, and performance optimization (API v2026-01). Use when working with .liquid files, building Shopify themes or apps, writing GraphQL queries for Shopify, debugging Liquid errors, creating app extensions, migrating from Scripts to Functions, or building headless storefronts. Triggers on "Shopify", "Liquid template", "Hydrogen", "Storefront API", "theme development", "Shopify Functions", "Polaris". Do NOT use for non-Shopify e-commerce platforms.

Expert guide for designing and building high-quality skills from scratch through structured conversation. Use when someone wants to create a new skill, build a skill, design a skill, or asks for help making Agents do something consistently. Also use when someone says "turn this into a skill", "I want to automate this workflow", "how do I teach my Agent to do X", or mentions creating SKILL.md files. Covers standalone skills and MCP-enhanced workflows. Do NOT use for creating subagents (use subagent-creator) or technical design documents (use create-technical-design-doc).

When the user wants to sell through social media, optimize LinkedIn for sales, build DM sequences, or convert content engagement into pipeline. Also use when the user mentions 'social selling,' 'LinkedIn selling,' 'LinkedIn DMs,' 'social prospecting,' 'LinkedIn Sales Navigator,' 'DM sequences,' 'LinkedIn outreach,' 'social pipeline,' or 'LinkedIn optimization.' This skill covers social selling strategy from profile optimization through DM-to-deal conversion. Do NOT use for technical implementation, code review, or software architecture.

When the user is a solo founder building their GTM motion, wants to scale without hiring, or needs to design an AI agent team for go-to-market. Also use when the user mentions 'solo founder,' 'one-person startup,' 'solopreneur,' 'bootstrapped,' 'no team,' 'AI agents as team,' 'scaling without hiring,' 'founder-led sales,' 'lean GTM,' 'one-person company,' or 'no employees.' This skill covers the complete solo founder GTM playbook from stack selection through agent team design, revenue-stage transitions, time allocation, and when to finally hire. Do NOT use for technical implementation, code review, or software architecture.

Scores how completely an implementation fulfills a PRD/spec, case by case, and produces a single comparable final grade. Invoke only when explicitly named (e.g. run spec-driven-eval); do not auto-trigger. Use when benchmarking spec-driven implementations, grading acceptance criteria, evaluating whether a feature was 100% implemented, comparing multiple implementations of the same PRD, or auditing implementation and test coverage (unit and e2e) against product requirements. Do NOT use for planning or building features (use tlc-spec-driven), writing PRDs, or general code review unrelated to a spec.

Guide for creating AI subagents with isolated context for complex multi-step workflows. Use when users want to create a subagent, specialized agent, verifier, debugger, or orchestrator that requires isolated context and deep specialization. Works with any agent that supports subagent delegation. Triggers on "create subagent", "new agent", "specialized assistant", "create verifier". Do NOT use for Cursor-specific subagents (use cursor-subagent-creator instead).

Detects anemic domain models, validates and refactors them into rich domain models, and enforces tactical DDD patterns (Entities, Value Objects, Aggregates, Domain Services, Domain Events). Use when the user asks to validate, review, or check domain models or DDD code; detect anemia; refactor domain objects; improve encapsulation; or mentions terms like "anemic model", "rich domain", "aggregate", "value object", "domain event", "ubiquitous language", "is this good DDD", "does this follow DDD", or "check my domain". Do NOT use for module or service boundary design, architectural decomposition, strategic DDD context mapping, or code outside the domain layer (DTOs, controllers, infrastructure adapters).

Creates comprehensive Technical Design Documents (TDD) with mandatory and optional sections through interactive discovery. Use when user asks to "write a design doc", "create a TDD", "technical spec", "architecture document", "RFC", "design proposal", or needs to document a technical decision before implementation. Do NOT use for README files, API docs, or general documentation (use docs-writer instead).

Use when challenging ideas, plans, decisions, or proposals. Invoke to play devil's advocate, run a pre-mortem, red team, stress test assumptions, audit evidence quality, or find blind spots before committing. Do NOT use for building plans, making decisions, or generating solutions — this skill only challenges and critiques. For a multi-agent panel that challenges and then commits to a verdict, use the-jury.

Use when a question, decision, plan, tradeoff, or claim needs a rigorous verdict and one perspective is not enough. Spawns a panel of 3 to 5 subagent jurors that form independent blind opinions, deliberate anonymously under an anti-anchoring and anti-sycophancy protocol, and return one committed verdict with confidence, preserved dissent, and a concrete next action. Domain-agnostic across engineering, architecture, data, product, hiring, strategy, vendor choice, build-vs-buy, and research design. Trigger phrases include "convene a jury", "have agents debate and decide", "get a panel to decide", "multi-agent decision", "stress-test this and decide", "monte um juri", "tribunal de agentes", "painel para decidir". Do NOT use to only critique without deciding (use the-fool for that), to build a plan or write the solution itself, or for simple factual lookups.

Interviews an unshaped idea into a verdict and a design document - decisions, flows, schema, contracts - that anyone can plan from without having been in the room. Use when the user says "research this", "help me understand this problem", "should we build this", "discovery", "explore this problem", or "tlc-discover". Do NOT use to cut a finished design into tasks, or to implement.

Implement a work already planned: extracts a checklist, builds it, and proves every check with an independent verifier. Use when the user says "extract a checklist", "build this ticket", "implement this spec", or "tlc-implement". Do NOT use when nobody has decided what to build, or to design the work.

Turns decided work — a PRD, design doc, RFC, or thread — into tasks a builder can act on without guessing. Finds slices that each prove something, grounds them in the code, and writes intent, observable criteria with concrete values, the boundary, what the change disturbs, and only the decisions that are hard to reverse. Walks every surface the work exposes and sweeps the nine unwritten requirements, recording each landing as a criterion already in the source, existing behaviour, n/a, or Unresolved — never as a criterion the walk invented. Defaults to one task per source. Use when the user says "write the task", "cut this PRD into tasks", "turn this design doc into work", or "tlc-plan". Do NOT use for discovery itself or to implement — a one-line ticket is a decision; a blank wish is not.

Feature planning and implementation with 4 adaptive phases (Specify, Design, Tasks, Execute). Auto-sizes depth by complexity. Writes testable requirements in EARS notation, atomic tasks, atomic Conventional Commits, and requirement traceability. Ships deterministic Python validation scripts so structural gates are enforced by code, not memory. Features an independent Verifier (author != verifier, evidence-or-zero), a discrimination sensor, a decision log (STATE.md), a test-coverage matrix, and a self-improving lessons layer. Stack-agnostic and tool-agnostic. Use when (1) planning features, (2) implementing with verification and atomic commits, (3) validating an implementation against a spec. Triggers on "specify feature", "discuss feature", "design", "tasks", "implement", "validate", "verify work", "UAT", "record decision", "pause work", "resume work". Do NOT use for pure architecture decomposition analysis or standalone technical design documents.

Spec-driven feature work that freezes obligations instead of the plan: one human-reviewed plan with EARS criteria, path, entities, interface and one-way doors, then proof-backed checks, then build, then an independent Verifier. Use when the user says "tlc-spec-lean", "plan feature", "specify feature", "write the checks", "build this plan", or "verify work". Do NOT use for standalone design documents unattached to a feature, architecture decomposition analysis, or work that already has a task list or checklist to execute.

Deploy applications and websites to Vercel. Use when the user requests deployment actions like "deploy my app", "deploy and give me the link", "push this live", or "create a preview deployment". Do NOT use for deploying to Netlify, Cloudflare, or Render (use their respective skills).

When the user wants to build video-first cold outreach, create personalized video at scale, implement async selling, or use AI demo generation for prospecting. Also use when the user mentions 'video outreach,' 'personalized video,' 'video prospecting,' 'Tavus,' 'Sendspark,' 'HeyGen,' 'video email,' 'async selling,' 'video demo,' or 'made this for you.' This skill covers video-first outreach systems from personalization through conversion optimization. Do NOT use for technical implementation, code review, or software architecture.

Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices". Focuses on visual design and interaction patterns. Do NOT use for performance audits (use core-web-vitals), SEO (use seo), or comprehensive site audits (use web-quality-audit).