Four-skill presentation system: ingest talks into a rhetoric vault, run interactive clarification, generate a speaker profile, then create new presentations that match your documented patterns. Includes an 88-entry Presentation Patterns taxonomy for scoring, brainstorming, and go-live preparation.
96
93%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
97%
1.21xAverage score across 30 eval scenarios
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Run scripts/guardrail-check.py <outline.md> <speaker-profile.json> to compute
guardrail checks. The script handles the three-outcome PASS/WARN/FAIL logic:
[FAIL] — value exceeds the limit[WARN] — value is under the limit but within 5 percentage points of it[PASS] — value is under the limit by more than 5 percentage pointsThe script checks: slide budget, Act 1 ratio, closing completeness, cut lines, data attribution, and profanity. Add the remaining checks (branding, time-sensitive, anti-patterns, illustration coverage, pattern strategy) to the report manually.
Every antipattern flag MUST be tagged as one of:
[RECURRING] — matches a pattern in the speaker's antipattern_frequency
or recurring_issues profile history. The speaker has done this before.[CONTEXTUAL] — detected in the current outline but NOT in the speaker's
historical profile. First-time issue for this talk.Never use generic unlabeled antipattern warnings.
When recommending presentation patterns, organize into exactly four tiers:
signature_patterns)contextual_patterns)evals
scenario-1
scenario-2
scenario-3
scenario-4
scenario-5
scenario-6
scenario-7
scenario-8
scenario-9
scenario-10
scenario-11
scenario-12
scenario-13
scenario-14
scenario-15
scenario-16
scenario-17
scenario-18
scenario-19
scenario-20
scenario-21
scenario-22
scenario-23
scenario-24
scenario-25
scenario-26
scenario-27
scenario-28
scenario-29
scenario-30
rules
skills
presentation-creator
references
patterns
build
deliver
prepare
scripts
vault-clarification
vault-ingress
vault-profile